Rewired360 Β· Clinical Research
Grief & Loss Research Library
Foundational studies, landmark frameworks, and current research for clinicians building expertise in grief, bereavement, and traumatic loss.
Foundational Frameworks
Prolonged Grief Disorder
Meaning-Making
Resilience Research
ADEC Six Themes
This library is organized around the Association for Death Education and Counseling (ADEC) six core themes in thanatology. Whether you are beginning your grief education or deepening your clinical practice, these articles and frameworks form the essential literature base every clinician should know.
Showing all studies
No studies match your search. Try different keywords or clear the filter.
The Grief Map Framework: A Dimensional Approach to Clinical Grief Assessment in EMDR
Couch, K. (2026). The Grief Map Framework: A dimensional approach to clinical grief assessment in EMDR [Preregistered pilot study]. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io
The Grief Map Pilot Study is a multi-cohort, single-group repeated measures design examining what changes when EMDR-trained clinicians learn to assess grief dimensionally. Preregistered on OSF April 27, 2026 β before a single data point is collected. Five research questions track changes in clinician confidence across dimensional target identification, adaptive vs. frozen yearning, 30-day behavioral transfer, polyvagal co-regulation, and identity disruption as complicated grief threshold. Data collection begins May 21, 2026.
Read the Announcement
Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner
Worden, J. W. (2018). Grief counseling and grief therapy (5th ed.). Springer Publishing. (Original 1982)
The definitive clinical handbook introducing the Four Tasks of Mourning β shifting grief theory away from passive "stages" toward active, adaptive processes. Essential for understanding the grief counseling vs. grief therapy distinction that shapes clinical practice today.
View Reference
On Death and Dying
KΓΌbler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. Macmillan.
The landmark text introducing the five-stage model (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance), originally based on observations with terminally ill patients. Foundational historically β and equally important to understand its significant limitations when applied to bereavement populations.
View Reference
Disenfranchised Grief: New Directions, Challenges, and Strategies for Practice
Doka, K. J. (Ed.). (2002). Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges, and strategies for practice. Research Press.
Doka's foundational contribution naming grief that is not openly acknowledged, publicly mourned, or socially supported. Essential for understanding marginalized losses: pet loss, miscarriage, suicide bereavement, estranged relationships, and more.
View via ADEC
Grief and Bereavement in Contemporary Society: Bridging Research and Practice
Neimeyer, R. A., Harris, D., Winokuer, H., & Thornton, G. (Eds.). (2011). Grief and bereavement in contemporary society. Routledge.
A landmark edited volume bringing together leading voices in bereavement research and clinical practice. Covers attachment, meaning-making, resilience, cultural dimensions of grief, and evidence-based interventions β a cornerstone graduate-level resource for clinicians at any stage of their grief education.
View Reference
Techniques of Grief Therapy: Creative Practices for Counseling the Bereaved
Neimeyer, R. A. (Ed.). (2012). Techniques of grief therapy. Routledge. [Vol. 2: Assessment and Intervention, 2016]
An indispensable clinical guidebook compiling the most inventive and evidence-informed interventions in grief counseling and therapy. Organized thematically for ease of clinical use, with detailed guidance on when β and when not β to use each technique. Required reading for practicing grief clinicians.
View Reference
Meaning Reconstruction and the Experience of Loss
Neimeyer, R. A. (Ed.). (2001). Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. American Psychological Association.
The volume that launched the meaning reconstruction paradigm in bereavement research. Neimeyer and colleagues argue that grief disrupts the bereaved person's self-narrative and identity, requiring active reconstruction of meaning β not merely emotional adjustment to loss. Highly influential across clinical and research contexts.
View Reference
Meaning Reconstruction in the Wake of Loss: Evolution of a Research Program
Neimeyer, R. A. (2016). Meaning reconstruction in the wake of loss. Behaviour Change, 33(2), 65β79. https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2016.5
A 20-year retrospective on Neimeyer's meaning reconstruction research, tracing how sense-making and benefit-finding shape bereavement adaptation. Reviews validated measures, therapeutic methods, and implications for grief therapy across an international network of collaborators.
Read Article
Living Beyond Loss: Questions and Answers About Grief and Bereavement
Neimeyer, R. A. (2026). Living beyond loss. Routledge. (Series in Death, Dying, and Bereavement)
Neimeyer's most recent volume β drawn from his long-running "Ask Dr. Neimeyer" column on the AfterTalk grief support platform. Offers compassionate, clinically grounded responses to the real questions bereaved people carry. Bridges research and lived experience in an accessible Q&A format ideal for clinicians and clients alike.
Ask Dr. Neimeyer Column
Making Sense of Loss and Benefiting from the Experience: Two Construals of Meaning
Davis, C. G., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Larson, J. (1998). Making sense of loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 561β574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.561
A foundational prospective longitudinal study differentiating sense-making (understanding why the loss occurred) and benefit-finding (identifying positive outcomes from the experience). Both independently predict adjustment over time β a core empirical anchor for meaning-based grief models.
Read on PubMed
A Social Constructionist Account of Grief: Loss and the Narration of Meaning
Neimeyer, R. A., Klass, D., & Dennis, M. R. (2014). Death Studies, 38(8), 485β498. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2014.913454
Situates grief within a relational and narrative framework, arguing that the meaning of loss is co-constructed through social interaction and storytelling. Bridges constructivist theory with continuing bonds research and expands the clinical scope of meaning-oriented grief therapy.
Read on PubMed
Resilience to Loss and Chronic Grief: A Prospective Study from Preloss to 18-Months Postloss
Bonanno, G. A., Wortman, C. B., et al. (2002). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1150β1164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1150
A landmark prospective study of 205 spousal bereavement participants. Identified five core grief trajectories β with resilience as the most frequent outcome. Overturned the clinical assumption that absent grief signals pathology, denial, or lack of attachment.
Read on PubMed
Loss, Trauma, and Human Resilience: Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive?
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). American Psychologist, 59(1), 20β28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
A pivotal theoretical synthesis arguing that resilience is far more prevalent after loss than clinical traditions assumed. Introduces the stable "resilient trajectory" and challenges the therapeutic assumption that those who grieve lightly are in denial. One of the most cited papers in the bereavement field.
Read Full Text
The Other Side of Sadness: What the New Science of Bereavement Tells Us About Life After Loss
Bonanno, G. A. (2009). The other side of sadness. Basic Books.
Bonanno's accessible synthesis of decades of bereavement research for clinicians and general readers alike. Examines how most people return to functioning relatively quickly after loss β and what distinguishes those who struggle. Essential companion for client psychoeducation.
View Reference
The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement: Rationale and Description
Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (1999). Death Studies, 23(3), 197β224. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811899201046
One of the most widely cited frameworks in contemporary grief research. The DPM proposes that adaptive bereavement coping involves oscillation between loss-oriented and restoration-oriented stressors β with necessary periods of respite. Challenges the grief work hypothesis directly.
Read on PubMed
The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement: A Decade On
Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (2010). Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 61(4), 273β289. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.61.4.b
A ten-year update summarizing theoretical refinements and empirical developments since the original DPM. Reviews evidence supporting the oscillation construct, cultural variations in coping, and directions for future research. Essential companion to the 1999 paper.
Read Article
A Cognitive-Behavioral Conceptualization of Complicated Grief
Boelen, P. A., et al. (2006). Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(2), 109β128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00013.x
Introduces an empirically supported cognitive-behavioral model of complicated grief, identifying negative cognitions about the loss and the self as central maintaining mechanisms. Foundational for understanding CBT-based grief treatments and the cognitive processes underlying prolonged grief disorder.
Read on PubMed
Validation of the New DSM-5-TR Criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder and the PG-13-Revised Scale
Prigerson, H. G., et al. (2021). World Psychiatry, 20(1), 96β106. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20823
Validated the DSM-5-TR PGD diagnostic criteria and the PG-13-R across three independent international datasets (Yale, Utrecht, Oxford). Confirmed PGD is statistically distinct from PTSD, major depression, and generalized anxiety. PG-13-R score of 30+ is consistent with a PGD diagnosis.
Read Full Text (PMC)
Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11
Prigerson, H. G., et al. (2009). PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121
Provides the psychometric validation for PGD diagnostic criteria, demonstrating that PGD symptoms are distinct from depression and PTSD and independently predict distress and functional impairment beyond 6 months. Foundational for the eventual inclusion of PGD in both DSM-5-TR and ICD-11.
Read on PubMed
Inventory of Complicated Grief: A Scale to Measure Maladaptive Symptoms of Loss
Prigerson, H. G., et al. (1995). Psychiatry Research, 59(1-2), 65β79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2
Development and validation of the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) β the most widely used clinical tool for identifying grief-related pathology. The ICG anchored all major PGD treatment trials and directly informed the PG-13-R screening instrument used today.
Read on PubMed
Treatment of Complicated Grief: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Shear, K., et al. (2005). JAMA, 293(21), 2601β2608. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2601
The first empirically validated RCT for complicated grief β now known as Prolonged Grief Therapy (PGT). Demonstrated significantly superior outcomes for the grief-focused protocol over interpersonal psychotherapy. Established the evidence base for specialized grief treatment.
Read on PubMed
Prolonged Grief Disorder in DSM-5-TR: Diagnostic Criteria and Clinical Significance
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Prolonged grief disorder. In DSM-5-TR. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
The formal inclusion of PGD in DSM-5-TR (March 2022). Requires grief lasting 12+ months after the death of someone close, characterized by intense yearning or preoccupation, plus three of eight additional symptoms causing significant distress or functional impairment. Distinct from major depression and PTSD.
APA Clinical Overview
The Efficacy of Complicated Grief Therapy for DSM-5-TR Prolonged Grief Disorder
Mauro, C., et al. (2022). World Psychiatry, 21(2), 215β216. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20971
Tests Complicated Grief Treatment outcomes in participants meeting DSM-5-TR PGD criteria. Response rates of 88.2% in CGT versus 60.9% in controls β affirming grief-specific therapy as significantly superior to general supportive approaches for formally diagnosed PGD.
Read Full Text
Assessing Grief and Prolonged Grief Disorder: Can One Size Fit All?
Prigerson, H. G., & Maciejewski, P. K. (2025). Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 213(7), 159β163. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001838
Prigerson and Maciejewski's most recent paper makes a compelling case that the PG-13-R can reliably assess both normative grief and PGD. Traces the evolution from the original ICG through successive revisions, arguing that symptoms function as indicators of grief intensity β not as defining features of the disorder itself. A landmark clarification for clinicians navigating grief assessment in practice.
Read Full Article
Prolonged Grief Disorder in Section II of DSM-5: A Commentary
Boelen, P. A., & Lenferink, L. I. M. (2021). European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), 1963791. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1963791
A scientific and clinical commentary welcoming PGD's formal DSM-5 inclusion while raising considerations about the 12-month time criterion and the need for harmonization with ICD-11. Reviews evidence that PGD has distinct neurobiological correlates and responds better to grief-specific than depression-focused treatment.
Read Full Text
Bereavement-Related Depression and Prolonged Grief Disorder
Maciejewski, P. K., & Prigerson, H. G. (2024). In Reynolds et al. (Eds.), Grief and prolonged grief disorder (pp. 151β152). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
A clinically essential chapter from the first comprehensive APA handbook on grief and PGD. Addresses one of the most persistent sources of diagnostic confusion: how to differentiate bereavement-related depression from prolonged grief disorder, and how to recognize and manage their co-occurrence.
View APA Handbook
Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder as a Call to Action: Advancing the Field of Childhood Grief
Layne, C. M., et al. (2021). Death Studies. https://www.academia.edu/55502885
Uses the proposed PCBD diagnosis as a catalyst to advance childhood grief research. Examines the risks of over-pathologizing normal grief in bereaved youth, the importance of distinguishing adaptive from maladaptive grief reactions, and calls for rigorous research to refine diagnosis and enhance clinical intervention for bereaved children and adolescents.
Read on Academia.edu
Attachment and Loss, Vol. 3: Loss β Sadness and Depression
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol. 3. Basic Books.
The third volume of Bowlby's foundational trilogy, applying attachment theory directly to bereavement. Proposed that grief is an evolved biological response to disruption of attachment bonds, and described four phases of mourning (numbness, yearning, disorganization, reorganization). An indispensable cornerstone of all grief theory.
View Reference
Bereavement: Studies of Grief in Adult Life
Parkes, C. M. (2010). Bereavement: Studies of grief in adult life (4th ed.). Routledge. (Original 1972)
Parkes's landmark longitudinal study of widows in London, establishing the empirical foundation for attachment-based models of grief. Introduced concepts of pining, searching behavior, and the sense of presence of the deceased. Essential reading for the relational and biological dimensions of loss.
View Reference
Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief
Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds. Taylor & Francis.
The paradigm-shifting text challenging the dominant "letting go" model of grief. Demonstrates across cultures and populations that maintaining an inner relationship with the deceased β rather than severing bonds β is a normal and healthy part of adaptation to loss. Transformative for clinical practice.
View Reference
Continuing Bonds and Reconstructing Meaning: Mitigating Complications in Bereavement
Neimeyer, R. A., Baldwin, S. A., & Gillies, J. (2006). Death Studies, 30(8), 715β738. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180600848322
Examines the interaction between continuing bonds and meaning-making in bereavement adaptation. Finds that strong ongoing attachment predicts greater distress β but only when survivors are unable to make sense of the loss. Demonstrates that sense-making moderates the relationship between continuing bonds and complicated grief.
Read on PubMed
Disenfranchised Grief: Recognizing Hidden Sorrow
Doka, K. J. (Ed.). (1989). Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow. Lexington Books.
The original volume introducing the concept of disenfranchised grief β the grief that results when a loss is not or cannot be openly acknowledged, publicly mourned, or socially supported. The first systematic framework for losses society fails to recognize, including AIDS-related deaths, losses by marginalized individuals, and socially stigmatized relationships.
View via ADEC
Disenfranchisement as Empathic Failure: Grief Therapy and the Co-Construction of Meaning
Neimeyer, R. A., & Jordan, J. R. (2002). In K. J. Doka (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief (pp. 95β117). Research Press.
Reframes disenfranchised grief through a meaning-making and relational lens, arguing that the pain of unrecognized grief is fundamentally an experience of empathic failure by one's social environment. Offers clinical guidance for grief therapists working to validate and witness losses the wider world refuses to see.
Explore the Blog
No studies match your search. Try different keywords or clear the filter.
Ready to Go Deeper?
Join the Kathy on the Couch community β monthly CEUs, consultation groups, clinical tools, and a community of grief and trauma clinicians who take this work seriously.
